Chapter 1
- Pg 18 – Research background – include Sabah background earlier on – general 1-2 pages to focus on Sabah issues
- Relate with Sabah scenario at the end of paragraph – highlight empirical needs
- Pg 25 – 1.2 Problem Statement – justify why EA become mediator – straight away involve and relate to Sabah case
- Pg 26 – Provide evidence – not enough data supporting claims
- Pg 27 – Insert evidence saying Sabah adoption low, last paragraph of 1.2 approach objectively farmers as entrepreneurs – why study as mediation justify with evidence
- 1.3 Research objective – theory or construct? – check cohesiveness of problem statement with RO and RQ
- Add construct definition – small-scale farmers
Chapter 2
- Synthesis literature- how the construct relates back to my study in regard with smallholders
- 2.2.2 agriculture development in sabah – how it is related to constructs
- pg 47 – rearrange agriculture story
- pg 47-49 – add evidence and support
- pg 49 – add more references – add subsection on entrepreneurial ambidexterity
- pg 51-52 – explain how the review is related to my study and why i adopt suggestion from the studies
- pg 53 – connectivity and references
- pg 57 – 2.5.2 justify final development
- 2.6.1 references
Chapter 3
- 3.2 research paradigm and design – ontology & epistomology
- 3.3.1.4 attach appendix of clearance and permission
Chapter 4
- References and support why choose second order modelling
- 4.5.2 Sabah Divisional analysis extract from thesis
Chapter 5
- Support statements or findings benchmark with previous studies or reference from other places
- Suggest workable strategies so that they are able to adopt – how it can be done
- Rephrase title 5.2.1
- 5.2.2 refer Chapter 4
- 5.3.1 First order and second order analysis
- 5.6 Conclusion – what it could solve, can it yield high output?, what support is needed?
Others:
- Check for originality
- Check English American or UK
- Typos and figures
- Turnitin
- Student feedback form (Weekend)